Read the film's script
Opening
A finished question, checked. Two friends bought a flat together to live in, holding it as beneficial joint tenants. No declaration was made about how the equity would be shared. One of them has now died, and the survivor wishes to sell the flat to a buyer. Which of the following best describes how the deceased’s interest in the flat passes? The best answer is B.
One exam stands between you and SQE2.
SQE1 July 2026: 47% of first-time candidates passed, 42% of all candidates · SRA, 29 September 2026.
Your material
Upload your notes.
Lecture notes, Slides, Photos of handwriting.
Read page by page, mapped to the SRA syllabus.
Mapped to the SRA syllabus: Land Law › Co-ownership & trusts; Land Law › Title to land; Trusts Law › Trusts of the family home.
Nothing is written until you choose.
Two subtopics are ticked. About 14 questions from 2 subtopics. Generate from 2 selected.
The check
Written from your notes, to the SRA specification.
SRA SQE1 specification: Land Law › Co-ownership & trusts (Joint tenants and tenants in common, survivorship, severance).
Every option has a reason.
Checked before you see it.
One best answer · Facts and figures · Law as tested in the exam · Every option explained.
Answered again, independently.
Answered independently, without seeing the answer: both say B.
Both answers must agree.
Checked. If anything is in doubt, the question is held back.
Practice
Closed Book · Question 12 of 85, 1:48 on the timer.
Timed like the day.
The candidate picks A, the will trap. A is wrong; B is the best answer.
Every option, explained.
A: the will trap.
B: survivorship.
C: no intestacy here.
D: no equal split.
E: no severance needed.
Ask Lex
You ask: “Why is it B and not A?”
Lex answers: Because they held as beneficial joint tenants, the right of survivorship applies. When one dies, their interest passes to the survivor automatically. A gift in the will cannot catch it, so the will is the trap.
From the SQEase law library
Lex explains the why.
Lex Coaching · Ultra: marks what matters, names what misleads.
Your plan
Mapped to the SRA’s SQE1 specification.
FLK1: Business Law and Practice, Dispute Resolution, Contract Law, Tort, Legal System of England and Wales, Constitutional and Administrative Law and EU Law, Legal Services.
FLK2: Property Law and Practice, Wills and the Administration of Estates, Solicitors Accounts, Land Law, Trusts Law, Criminal Liability, Criminal Law and Practice.
Practise the exact subtopics you need.
Land Law: Nature of land, Title to land, Co-ownership & trusts, Proprietary rights, Leases.
It tracks how you answer, not just what you know.
Answer habits · last 7 days (illustrative figures): First answer kept 71%, Changed right to wrong 18%, Long stems over time 34%.
Your week: Mon Co-ownership & trusts, 20 questions; Tue Trusts of the family home, Flashcards; Wed Title to land, 15 questions; Thu Mixed FLK2 set, 40 questions; Sat Closed Book mock, 85 questions.
Close
Walk in ready.
SQEase · Try it free · sqease.uk
From the SRA syllabus to practice questions, subtopic by subtopic
SQEase maps your whole revision to the SRA's own SQE1 specification — every topic, every subtopic — so you practise exactly what the exam tests. Here's how you get from where you are now to testing your knowledge on exactly what the exam covers.
Your exam, mapped — then practised, subtopic by subtopic.
Stage 4 — Lex explains. Why the right answer is right, and why the tempting one isn't.
- Negligence
- Defences
- Vicarious liability
- Occupiers' liability
- Product liability
- Nuisance
A defendant negligently caused a high-speed collision with the claimant, who suffered rib fractures and a punctured lung. Medical evidence confirms that while the injuries would have occurred regardless, wearing a seatbelt would have significantly reduced their severity. The defendant admits negligence but argues for a reduction in damages due to the claimant's failure to wear a seatbelt.
What is the most likely percentage by which the court will reduce the claimant's damages for contributory negligence?
B is the trap: under Froom v Butcher the 25% reduction applies only where a seatbelt would have avoided the injury entirely. Here it would merely have lessened the severity — so the 15% bracket applies, and the answer is D.
One checked question, for one subtopic, of one topic. SQEase maps questions across the whole SRA specification.
Your whole syllabus, mapped to the SQE1 specification
Every topic and subtopic follows the SRA's own SQE1 headings, so you can target practice down to a single subtopic.
Plus Ethics & Professional Conduct, examined pervasively across both papers — surfaced wherever it bites, not bolted on as an afterthought. SQEase is independent: it is not affiliated with or endorsed by the SRA.
Modelled on the SRA’s sample questions
We measured all 220 of the SRA’s published sample questions — how long the options are, where the right answer sits, how often they cite cases or use figures — and turned that into targets. Each new SQE1-style question is checked against those targets as it’s written.
New questions are answered again, independently
Before a new question reaches you, it is answered again from scratch — without being shown the proposed answer — and both answers must agree. If anything is in doubt, the question is held back.
Your own notes, same standard
Questions from your notes are written only after you pick the subtopics, and every one goes through the same check before you see it. If anything looks off, flag it in a tap — every report is re‑checked.
The method is here. The features are next door.
Map your whole course. Practise the exact spec.
Every FLK1 and FLK2 topic, subtopic by subtopic, following the SRA's SQE1 specification — with new questions checked before you see them.